product design | editorial strategy | rebrand

El Confidencial Home Page Redesign

For its 25th anniversary, El Confidencial rebuilt its home page from the ground up, alongside a full rebrand. As part of the design team, I helped move one of Spain's leading digital newspapers from a chaotic, section-based layout to a modular, topic-based design built for how people read today.

Role
Product designer
Client
El Confidencial
Year
2025 - 2026
www.elconfidencial.com
Page screenshot

Key changes

Why a Redesign?

The project sat at the intersection of external pressure, business strategy, and editorial ambition, and it had to launch in time for the paper's 25th anniversary.

External pressure

  • Google Discover changes in Europe began favoring individual creators and YouTubers over media outlets, cutting a major traffic source
  • AI-powered search shrank the window for readers to reach us, raising the stakes on direct visits to the home page
  • Like the rest of the industry, we were shifting toward a subscription model that depends on a direct, loyal reader relationship

Business goals

  • Ship a fully responsive home page, since we were the only newspaper in our sector without one
  • Widen the layout to 1200px to support the new ad formats competitors were already serving
  • Protect ad viewability and revenue through the transition

Editorial goals

  • Move from a section-based layout to a topic- and story-based architecture, like the NYT and Washington Post
  • Break up the relentless hard-news feel with a more varied mix to attract different readers
  • Integrate video and photography, and cut the excessive scroll that buried our best work

Balancing competing needs

The hardest part of the redesign wasn't any single screen. It was balancing what every team needed from one finite home page, under outside pressure from a shifting Google, while still serving the reader first.

Research

We approached the redesign with a wide research base: quantitative audits of our own templates, an extensive competitive benchmark, and qualitative work with readers of both the old and the new design.

We audited the existing home page using data on every template, looking at which were getting clicked and which weren't, to understand what was working and what content was being wasted further down the page.

Insights

Topics beat sections

Readers found the old mix of national and international news confusing, with the same section repeating at different depths. What landed was topic clustering, a story gathered in one place. People think in topics, not sections, which validated the core bet of the redesign.

Bylines drive subscriptions

For most readers, the columnists are the product, and bylines were the single most-cited reason they subscribe. Several wanted a proper opinion front with names and faces, Financial Times style. We treated opinion as a headline asset, not a footnote.

Opinion needs a predictable home

Readers wanted a fixed place for opinion so they always know where to find their columnists, yet also wanted day-relevant pieces to surface next to the story they respond to. Designing a stable home that still lets opinion rise with the news was one of the trickier balances.

Readers just want to read

Readers value a clean, calm reading experience over new features. What they pay for is independence, objectivity, and no clickbait, and several praised the 'sosiego' of a page that doesn't reshuffle every hour. Smoothness retains them more than any design trick.

Legibility is non-negotiable

With a largely older readership, legibility wasn't a nice-to-have. Readers flagged the gray entradillas as too light and the small bulleted 'píldoras' as too tiny. The new design read more clearly, though the gray tone is still on our list to fix.

Hierarchy from position, not photo size

Readers click the headline, not the photo, and read importance from a story's position far more than its image size. Big photos could even look like ads. So we drive hierarchy through placement and type, with photography supporting the order rather than setting it.

The personalization paradox

Readers say they don't want personalization, then in the same breath request it: hide sections they skip, local news by province, save-for-later. The data agrees, the one personalized module gets the most clicks by far. The challenge was never whether, only where.

Less appetite for video than expected

Appetite for video was low. Short vertical TikTok and reels-style clips were rejected almost unanimously, with produced investigation and explainer video the only exception. And since many read at work without sound, even good video often loses to text.

Smoothness beats tricks

Fewer pop-ups, a smoother login, a cleaner payment flow, and less intrusive ads retain more readers than any new feature. On mobile especially, readers said the advertising ate the screen. The base experience has to be excellent before anything clever sits on top.

Adapting to modern reading habits

The deeper question wasn't how to make the page prettier. It was whether organizing the news by section still made sense. We wanted the home page to adapt to how people read today: to attract new, loyal readers who would pay, and to improve the qualitative experience of reading on the site. That meant organizing content more by how people think naturally, around topics and relevant information, rather than around traditional sections, which are largely a holdover from print.

A modular template system

Early on I proposed building the page from a small set of consistent, modular templates rather than bespoke layouts. Each template aligns an article vertically or horizontally, varies the image aspect ratio, and sits within a column-based grid, unified by a clear type hierarchy with distinct headings for each template. The goal was a system that was modular, versatile, and simple. Getting the balance of those three was the hard part.

Topic and issue architecture

The new page is organized around issues rather than sections. Editors manually curate the opening and a sequence of issues, clusters of a lead story with supporting articles and context, followed by manually curated highlighted sections: economy, politics, international, and national, the topics our readers care about most. Below those, secondary sections like culture and sports populate automatically. Because issues aren't bound to a section, a big sports story can rise to the top as an issue and later drop back into its section, giving editors the agility to reorder, test, and eventually personalize modules.

New homepage, new branding

The redesign launched alongside a full rebrand: a new logo, color system, and custom typeface, developed by an external consultancy.

Final result: Key changes

The new homepage was the culmination of over a year of work by employees at all levels of the company, not just from the design team, but from employees across almost every department of the company. Best of all, it arrived just in time for the 25th anniversary of the paper.

Early signals

We A/B tested the new home page against the old one with a subset of users before launch. The early data was encouraging, with a few risks to watch.

Scroll depth improved significantly

Readers got meaningfully further down the new page than the old one. This addressed one of our core problems directly.

Click-through and time-on-page rose

Click-through edged up across many templates and time on page increased, suggesting a better qualitative experience.

Fewer articles, an SEO risk

The new page carries far fewer articles, and many of the ones cut were SEO pieces, raising a real question about Google discoverability that we'll watch closely.

Clearer and cleaner

In interviews, readers found the hierarchy clearer and the page cleaner and more legible, which matters for our older audience.

Confusion around the 'core'

Some readers questioned the 'core' section above the issues, asking why economy stories appeared there and again in the economy section below. It's a holdover from section-based thinking, and we may not use it often.

What we're watching

Post-launch we're tracking ad viewability, template click-through (especially secondary sections), SEO rankings, subscriptions, and direct reader feedback via a launch survey.

Takeaways

This was the most people we'd ever put on a home-page redesign, with no design system and no established workflow. Keeping it organized while building a design system in parallel, after having proposed the modular template approach, is what I'm proudest of.